Derrida

 

Derrida

Philosophical works are, without exception, notoriously difficult to understand. This is because they deal with highly abstract concepts, leaving the reader with the heavy lifting of connecting those ideas to real life.

While writers like Rousseau and Nietzsche anchor their work in reality — making them relatively accessible — philosophers like Descartes, Kant, and Hegel are difficult in the most literal sense.

With Descartes, I could often relate his ideas to my own life experiences, which helped me grasp his arguments well. Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger, however, completely eluded me; as a result, I rarely made it past the first few pages of their books.

Derrida was a different story. During my freshman year of university, I tackled his major work, Writing and Difference. It was a massive volume, and I read it in English translation rather than the original French to help practice my language skills. While his writing was certainly dense, it resonated with me on an almost intuitive, visceral level. Because it just clicked, I managed to finish the entire book, though I recall it took me about a month or two.

Yesterday, this memory crossed my mind, so I decided to ask an AI for its perspective. The response is copied below.

I felt reassured to see the AI confirm that he is, indeed, well worth reading. While time-tested classics are always worth the effort, Derrida was still a relatively new and emerging figure back when I read him, so I had lingering doubts about whether my time had been well spent.