I'm not pro-war, or rather I'm a pacifist.
Yet I need to admit once in two or three decades destruction is in demand when something new ought to be introduced.
It needs considerable cost to destroy something. All cost should be considered to be investment to new facilities. Many people think it's inevitable in order to replace it to something new, but some might think it's stupid to spend tens of money to destroy something old.
I'm not pro-war, but there is a positive side in war when it comes to 'economic' destruction. You don't have to spend it but let others do.
No comments:
Post a Comment