Reply to hans

Friday, February 27, 2009
A brunette

~mercedo 1 second agoWhat a fabulous brunette she is!--Ancient Greek Philosophers - 18c Enlightenment Thinkers - deviantART Users
Patti's Panty by ~hansdick
posted by Eiko Onoda # 4:07 AM
Comments:
this picture was considered pornographic on deviantArt and I was banned for posting it.
# posted by hans : 1:45 AM
Thanks for finding my post here and as to ban, sorry for that.Panty is originally invented to protect and hide person's genital part. We cannot see directly someone's private part owing to a panty, so when we compare someone who doesn't wear a panty thus naked and someone who wears a panty we tend to believe that is more explicit than this. Yes, it's more explicit but often less erotic. There is an eroticism that is emphasised by hiding, and I think you know that.As to whether it's pornographic, the position of hands matters a lot. It is considered pornographic if some thought the model is trying to show or open her genitalia.Three years ago few was posting a woman with an explicit genitals. There was a nude though. But now we can see too many photos that show women's genitals. Women's or men's genitals itself is not pornographic. You will be welcomed again if you took someon's natural nude. Stick to it!
# posted by Eiko Onoda : 5:19 AM