My Evolution

Re:How so?(Score:2)
by mercedo (822671) * on 2007.02.09 21:28 (#17946656) (http://www.blogger.com/profile/11854854 Last Journal: 2007.02.09 5:09)
Marxist Hacker, I'm sorry. I made a mistake. I was not supposed to be in a hurry after I got your remark. Apparently you are right. Entire argument here are about evolution( theory). And we are talking about how evolution occurs(method). I raised it's because of natural selection, and natural selection is a method how they evolves. So I have to correct my expression -Their design is not a result of evolution.as 'Their design is not a result of 'adjustment'. Because I was talking about how evolution occurs -by natural selection, adjustment, need or need not, etc.
Thanks for pointing out.
Many years ago I happened to read an article in Japanese in which the author -biologist concluded that we ought to believe evolution occurs not as aresult of adaptation, but natural selection by referring to a similar example as I raised. I felt very questionable, and now I realised the author of the article was wrong. Evolution occurs from various methods including natural selection, adjustment, need or need not, and it's just very silly for us to seek for only one method.
Through our talk, I was able to clarify the puzzle I had caught. That's my evolution.
--Ancient Greek Philosophers -18c Enlightenment Thinkers -Slashdotters